U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned a Colorado court decision barring Trump from the state's Republican primary ballot. The ruling focused on the 14th Amendment, highlighting Congress's exclusive authority over such matters, impacting Trump's bid for the Republican nomination against President Joe Biden.

The United States Supreme Court delivered a significant victory to Donald Trump on March 4, 2024, by unanimously overturning a Colorado court decision that sought to disqualify him from the state's Republican primary ballot. The Colorado court had invoked the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, arguing that it barred Trump from holding public office again due to his alleged involvement in inciting the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.


The Supreme Court justices declared that only Congress holds the authority to enforce the constitutional provision against federal officeholders and candidates. Despite the unanimous decision, four justices, including the three liberal members, criticized the rest of the court for announcing rules limiting how the provision could be enforced in the future.


As the frontrunner for the Republican nomination against Democratic President Joe Biden, Trump faced disqualification in Colorado, Maine, and Illinois based on the 14th Amendment. The ruling on the eve of Super Tuesday, a crucial day in the U.S. presidential primary cycle, added a layer of significance to the decision.


The court's 6-3 conservative majority, which includes three Trump appointees, acted swiftly on the ballot disqualification issue, diverging from the pace in resolving Trump's claim of immunity from charges related to overturning the 2020 election results. Delays in the immunity question could potentially benefit Trump by postponing his criminal trial.


The 14th Amendment's Section 3, invoked in this case, prohibits individuals who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding federal office. The court clarified that while states could disqualify individuals for state offices, they lacked the constitutional power to enforce Section 3 with regard to federal offices, especially the presidency.


Trump, in response to the ruling, expressed satisfaction, emphasizing that opponents should not be able to remove a candidate from a race based on personal preferences. He hoped the decision would contribute to national unity but took the opportunity to criticize political adversaries and prosecutors involved in ongoing criminal cases against him. The decisions in Maine and Illinois were put on hold pending the Supreme Court's ruling in the Colorado case, indicating broader implications beyond the specific state.

Naijamatta is a social networking site,

download Naijamatta from Google play store or visit to register. You can post, comment, do voice and video call, join and open group, go live etc. Join Naijamatta family, the Green app.

Click To Download

Emma Chuks

3026 Blog posts